We Worked To Oust Trump, We Create ‘Propaganda,’ Use ‘Fear’ To Pass Climate Agenda

James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas released explosive video on Tuesday that showed CNN Technical Director Charlie Chester admitting that the network worked to get President Donald Trump out of office and that the network creates “propaganda” on issues they know little about.

While explosive, the footage likely will not come as a surprise are many; polling has shown that CNN is the least trusted cable news network and is the most divisive media brand in the country.

On CNN and its employees working to oust Trump from office, Chester made the following remarks throughout various encounters that he had with an undercover Project Veritas journalist:

• “Look what we did, we [CNN] got Trump out. I am 100% going to say it, and I, 100% believe, that if it wasn’t for CNN, I don’t know that Trump would have got voted out…I came to CNN because I wanted to be a part of that.”
• “It’s going to be our [CNN’s] focus. Like our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that’s what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be climate change awareness.”

On CNN creating “propaganda” to damage Trump, Chester said:

• “[Trump’s] hand was shaking or whatever, I think. We brought in so many medical people to tell a story that was all speculation — that he was neurologically damaged, and he was losing it. He’s unfit to — you know, whatever. We were creating a story there that we didn’t know anything about. That’s what — I think that’s propaganda.”

On having a predetermined agenda to cover climate change and to use “fear” to sell it, Chester said:

• “I think there’s a COVID fatigue. So, like whenever a new story comes up, they’re [CNN’s] going to latch onto it. They’ve already announced in our office that once the public is — will be open to it — we’re going to start focusing mainly on climate.”
• “I have a feeling that it’s going to be like, constantly showing videos of decline in ice, and weather warming up, and like the effects it’s having on the economy–”
• Climate change is the next “pandemic-like story that we’ll beat to death, but that one’s got longevity. You know what I mean? Like there’s a definitive ending to the pandemic. It’ll taper off to a point that it’s not a problem anymore. Climate change can take years, so they’ll [CNN will] probably be able to milk that quite a bit.”
• “Be prepared, it’s coming. Climate change is going to be the next COVID thing for CNN.”
• When asked if CNN was going to use “fear” to push their agenda, Chester said, “Yeah. Fear sells.”

You might get off FB and read a bit of international news and what is going on around the world with Iran, Russia, and China.

Oh yeah, just pick out your own un-based and trustworthy news sources because we are only 333 Million and there are ~7.5 Billion others with other opinions and a good number of those are Not our friends. China vs Russia vs America: Is 2021 the year Orwell’s 1984 comes true?

This week, President Biden said he would push for new firearm restrictions regardless of whether Congress goes along with it.

He said, “My job, the job of any president, is to protect the American people. Whether Congress acts or not I’m going to use all the resources at my disposal as president to keep the American people safe from gun violence, but they’ve passed not a single new federal law that has reduced gun violence.”

Since the hundreds of laws on the books have not kept American’s safe from “people on people” violence, its obvious PEOPLE are the problem.

Other than accidents, suicides in America claim the lives of over 48,000 people a year again which is a solid indicator it’s a “person” problem not the technique or devise they end their lives with.

Since the suicide rate is 2.5 times the homicide rate, which is a “people on people” crime, it sounds like a stronger set of laws on not committing suicide is in order.

Like the laws on illegal drugs, I am sure a stronger anti-suicide law would work also. You think?

Other than in war, people kill people because of greed (robbery, drugs, money, objects), humiliation (public humiliation, ridicule, and shamed), safety (domestic violence, protecting self), and cheating (spousal) and a myriad of other reasons.

When legislators consider changes to criminal justice policy, they often face the question of whether the changes will prevent people from committing crimes. Deterrence theory looks at the relationship between the severity of punishment, the certainty that a criminal will be punished, and the speed with which the punishment will be inflicted.

Toward this end research has shown that: * crimes involving conscious planning can be more easily deterred but not those that relate to addiction or sudden emotions; * increases in prison sentences have little deterrent effect; and * policies that increase the likelihood of being caught deter crime. It also indicates the following:

1. Evidence indicates that crime is disproportionately concentrated in economically distressed areas and that reducing poverty can also reduce crime.

2. Addressing mental illness can also lower crime rates.

3. There is an undisputed link between addiction and crime, and that providing chemical dependency treatment is particularly effective at reducing property crime rates.

4. The most common method of addressing crime, though, is through enforcement and punishment.

Its People! Since we can’t legislate morality into the heart, more restrictive gun laws will not transform those who would seek to harm others. Rather than creating more laws that have no effect (ie: illegal drugs & its corresponding laws), we should focus on helping people deal with their mental problem.

We have a culture of violence and death, a waning respect for the dignity of all human beings, a lack of community, a need for better access to mental health care, and a host of other problems and needs that must and should be addressed first.

China is positioning itself to take over Taiwan who they consider just a breakaway province. A military move on Taiwan by China will be a test of Biden (and company) very soon. Will America allow it or defend them. I do not think America has the will to support democracies in need and bear the cost of supporting them what ever if takes. Like it if not, it’s coming soon …China vs USA …. Big Stick or empty words!

Despite a Global Level 4: Do Not Travel advisory, and there remain passengers who are traveling without any personal protective equipment (PPE) such as face masks. So with the social distance guidelines and specific spacing to even eat in a restaurant, how is this remotely or even considered safe & legal?

The following government requirement for individuals having a pilot license and needing a physical, makes one wonder how this guidance could apply to ANYONE that had a history of COVID-19 in any job or occupation.

So, can or will annual, semi-annual, or pre-employment physical exams that assures companies that employees are physically and mentally able to take on the responsibilities of a job also have similar requirements? Like those with a CDL and such.

Per the FAA: As long as the pilot or air traffic control (ATC) specialist is otherwise qualified, an aviation medical examiner can issue a medical certificate when the person who had a confirmed case of COVID-19 and who were hospitalized (but not in intensive care), the doctor should forward any applicable records to the FAA after issuing the medical certificate.

The doctor then must defer applications for individuals who were in intensive care or “are experiencing ongoing residual signs and/or symptoms of confirmed COVID-19.”

The ongoing signs and symptoms “may include but are not limited to cardiovascular dysfunction, respiratory abnormalities, kidney injury, neurological dysfunction, psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, moodiness), or symptoms such as fatigue, and such,” according to the guidance sent to aviation physicians.

This means the doctor cannot issue the medical certificate in the office and sends the completed application and any other medical records to the FAA’s Aerospace Medical Certification Division.

So, for individuals needing a physical should this guidance could apply to ANYONE that had a history of COVID-19 in any job or occupation?

Does the Freedom of having a different opinion makes someone a terrorist?

Student Calls Cops on Prageru

Why did a “Sane Society” elect a mentally challenged person to the highest position in America?

If a “sane society” can vote for a man who clearly is mentally challenged, then you are confessing that you have become so filled with ignorance or hate that you would see the very foundations of your country torn down. Anyone or anybody is better than non-politician orange man!

Just what does an individual tell him or herself, when they knowingly vote for a person they know not to be fit for public office?

Is that person comfortable knowing that a “committee” is behind the president’s activities and strategies? And that committee will also oversee a new President’s agenda?

This committee may or may not be same as the old one, but will it matter, either way, will America the land of the free die because of it?

The Media cannot claim either collective dementia or delusion. This is not new. They cannot be the victims of lies when they have propagated and spread almost all of them.

– ALL paraphrased from the article by the Unified Patriots-

So the government wants to take all the guns from honest people but can not take them from the organized crime, gangs, mobs, and criminals. So does that really sound like a good thing?

Bureau of Justice Statistics Response time – BEST case IF not busy – (civil unrest/ in riot = N/A)

Type Crime = W/in 5 Min – 6-10 Min – 11 Min –

Violence* 28.3% 30.3% 33.5%

Robbery 32.3% 38.8% 28.3%

Agg /Assault 20.9% 32.6% 36.4%

Simple Assault 31.4% 28.0% 31.8%

Property Crimes 12.8% 20.2% 47.8%

House Burglary 13.6% 21.8% 46.9%

Vehicle Theft 12.5% 22.2% 49.1%

Theft 12.5% 18.9% 48.0%

Most robberies occur on the street (44.5%), directly against a person, and are called a strong-arm robbery. The weapon of choice for robbers is the firearm (42.2%) with knives or cutting instruments second (8.6%). Strong-arm tactics like punching, pushing, kicking, or threats are used mainly on the street (39.9%).

When someone robs you in your home (14.3%) it’s called home invasion robbery. Most people have chosen to outsource their safety and security, instead of taking the very real and necessary steps to ensure their own well being.

Sadly, this attitude is the reason so many criminals feel safe and secure when committing their crimes. They know that the chances of being stopped by the average citizen are pretty low, and the likelihood of law enforcement arriving before they finish their crime is even smaller.